As many of you know, I am a freelance musician here in New York City. I am playing frequently, so I may as well use this platform to shamelessly promote my own endeavors. On the upper left hand side of your browser bar there should be a link to a new page with my upcoming shows. Hope to see some of you there!
Art projects are a great way to stimulate the economy. I recently wrote why the money for the NEA, taken out from the senate stimulus bill, should be re-included (which eventually was added back in conference). Darren W. Miller of Madness of Art has a much better post on this than I do. He says:
Spending stimulus dollars on the arts will, unquestionably, create jobs, but it also does a lot more than that: reinvigorating arts education in ours schools; rebuilding communities through public art (literally and figuratively) and thereby increasing local property values, improving the real estate market and making a place more attractive to small businesses; engaging new and otherwise financially shut-out audiences through free musical and theatrical performances; revitalizing and modernizing our public library system; and, in general, renewing the role of the arts in our culture, recognizing how it can boost our economy, placing value again in its transcendent powers.
All of these things are important, but it also good to note the progressive nature of funding the arts economically. First I’ll just describe simple economic theory and the ideas behind progressive taxation and public funding. In Microeconomics, supply and demand is “an economic model based on price, utility and quantity in a market.”
In a supply and demand model there are curves for both supply and demand along an x-axis labeled “quantity” and y-axis “price”:
P stands for Price, Q For Quantity, S for Supply and D for Demand
As the demand for a good increases the demand curve shifts from D1 to D2 increasing the optimal combination of the good’s price and the amount of the good that is produced.
For Luxury items the supply curve is far more steeply sloped, so that when demand goes up, new goods aren’t produced, but rather the price just increases. This is one of the main arguments against Supply-Side economics, because tax cuts at the top of the income spectrum is essentially a tax cut on luxury goods. Consequentially, wealth doesn’t actually trickle down, it just gets pocketed by the already wealthy business owners (who give a paltry portion of their income back to society compared to the poorest of us).
On the other hand, goods that are necessities are relatively inelastic, things like food or some kinds of clothing. These things are produced in such a huge quantity that increases in demand don’t affect the price so much. This means that the slope of the supply curve is low, possibly near zero. When goods like this are bought, much of the price of the good is in labor costs. This rewards the greater production of goods and real labor.
What does this have to do with art? If we award a grant to an artist or fund their project another way, there will be essentially no overhead costs. Most of the money goes to the production of the work, and in the case of music is used to hire other musicians. Artists, being on the lower end of the income scale, tend to buy less luxury goods and more goods of necessity. This, in turn, encourages greater good production (and a higher GDP) as opposed to inflating luxury prices.
A friend from my days in Miami, Andy Rice, and I are starting a slow going project tentatively titled: “Project Symphony“. He and a few of his friends run a web design studio called Miami Design Studio. Andy has a great description of what our goals are:
Without going into too much detail quite yet, this webapp will help classical musicians more easily procure and organize their sheet music. The goal is to create a large and easy-to-browse database of open source sheet music—both old and new works—that will facilitate the exchange of musical ideas and help make classical music a little bit more transparent and accessible. Musicians can add their own (presumably legal) copies of sheet music to the database and, conversely, add sheet music from the database into their own digital libraries and then manage them with a variety of organizational tools.
Simply put, musicians can remotely store and organize their sheet music collection as well as discover and share new compositions. Any musicians who have ever scrambled for missing pages or requested pieces the day of a gig will appreciate the usefulness of these features. It’s a pretty cool thing.
This will be incredibly useful for players as a central, easily accessible database for sheet music, and has the possibility to grow into a larger community with other functions than just being a music database like IMSLP.
Since school has just ended for me, I’ll have plenty of time to start tracking down public domain sheet music that hasn’t already been scanned by imslp. Hopefully this will start online library that doesn’t wholly rely on the work of submittors at imslp, though users are free to submit the works I upload here to there.
Apologies to readers, the posting may be a little light in the coming days as I’ll be preparing for and performing my senior recital on Sunday. Afterwards I hope to have some interesting articles on art and the economy and a guest post from Patti Kilroy on the edition of Bach Partitas and Sonatas I have hosted here.
For those readers here in New York City, I’ll be playing at the Tenri Cultural Institute at 8:00 pm on Sunday:
TENRI CULTURAL INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK
43A WEST 13TH STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10011
Up at the top left hand corner you’ll see home, about and now sheet music. As I continue to host more music I’ll throw it there so it’s still easily accessible and you don’t have a to dredge through all the posts on this blog. Happy playing.
A while ago I wrote about consumption and moving beyond post-modernism. In it I discussed how our new e-age is essentially an extension of post-modernism and that the projection of ourselves on social-networking utilities is a hypereality representative of this extension. As a reminder:
Hyperreality is closely related to the concept of the simulacrum: a copy or image without reference to an original. In postmodernism, hyperreality is the result of the technological mediation of experience, where what passes for reality is a network of images and signs without an external referent, such that what is represented is representation itself.
In a sense, what people project about themselves is supposed to represent their whole. Fortunately, a profile can only display so much and fails in this attempted representation. (I say fortunately, because think of how dull of a world it would be if an entire person were able to be represented by a web page!)
Today in the New York Times science section John Tierny wrote about how consumption of high-class, luxury goods by individuals of wealth is partly an evolutionarily competitive transmission:
Harvard diplomas and iPhones send the same kind of signal as the ornate tail of a peacock. Sometimes the message is as simple as “I’ve got resources to burn,” the classic conspicuous waste demonstrated by the energy expended to lift a peacock’s tail or the fuel guzzled by a Hummer. But brand-name products aren’t just about flaunting transient wealth. The audience for our signals — prospective mates, friends, rivals — care more about the permanent traits measured in tests of intelligence and personality, as Dr. Miller explains in his new book, “Spent: Sex, Evolution and Consumer Behavior.”
This man looks handsome in his gucci suit, but does that tell you anything about his personality?
What he concludes is that nobody in that audience for our signals (prospective mates, friends, etc.) actually care about these consumer objects, asking the reader if they can remember what their colleague or friend wore yesterday. What actually matters are the qualities of personality that can only be discovered over time (even if some things are clear in a simple, introductory conversation).
In this sense, the creation of these profiles on facebook matter very little when people actually take into account who they want to be friends or bff’s with. So why do we make them? Do we really create them out out of the “narcissistic fantasy that everyone else cares about what we [are],” what we did last night or dreamed*? The article leaves us as doomed to our evolutionary baggage and recommends the reader do a cost-benefit analysis of happiness gained vs. money spent on our new Louis-Vuitton bag. In essence he tells us to use our brain.
I find the article interesting because the professor interviewed, Dr. Geoffrey Miller, explicitly tells us that transient objects like our hyper-realistic profiles, or Rolex watches are unimportant in the decisions people make about whether to be your friend or not. Ultimately you can conclude that no amount of wealth can buy you social competence, intelligence even if it can buy you the presidency.
I recently applied for a collaborative grant to put on a performance art piece I am writing called The Cure at Troy. I am happy to announce that I have been awarded $2000 to rehearse, promote and perform my work:
On behalf of the review panel of the Coordinating Council for Music at New York University, I am delighted to inform you that you have been awarded a Creative Collaboration Support Grant. Your award is in the amount of $2,000 to be used in support of the expenses outlined in your proposal, during a one year project period beginning June 1, 2009. Details about expense reimbursement are attached for your information. Please sign and return the form to acknowledge acceptance of the award.
Each proposal was reviewed by a panel of faculty drawn from the representative schools comprising the Council: FAS, Gallatin, Steinhardt, Stern, and Tisch. The panel met and discussed the proposals, making judgments about which proposals deserved the highest priorities for support. Also considered was the project’s congruence with the goals of the Creative Collaboration Support Grant including a unique approach, the potential for strong collaborations, and a well-specified plan.
Congratulations and best wishes for a productive and successful year.
Irish poet and playwright Seamus Heaney based The Cure at Troy on Sophocles’ Philoctetes. The play aims to be a true translation of the text except for the catharsis, which reflects the tumultuous northern-Irish conflict between British Protestants and Irish Catholics. This collaborative project will create a performance piece where music and acting come together to reflect the emotional content of Heaney’s work, and update its meaning to our current post-9/11 mindset, where cycles of violence create a seemingly unending threat to our way of life.
The work features ten parts, four actors and 6 musicians. The actors are scored as representing Neoptolomus, Philoctetes and two chorus members. As for the musicians, there are 2 cellists and violinists, a violist and a pianist. The movements are subtitled as follows:
Philoctetes
Neoptolomus’ Pity
Philoctetes’ Venom
(Untitled so far)
As the project progresses, I’ll keep this blog up to date about anything interesting that’s going on. After the work is premiered, I’ll host a recording and (hopefully) a video. Additionally I’ll provide analysis of my work for those interested.
In today’s New York Times, an Op-Ed by Christopher Francese discussed how it was stupid to put latin on diplomas since no-one can understand it anyways:
Latin is a beautiful language and a relief from the incessant novelty and informality of the modern age. But when it’s used on diplomas, the effect is to obfuscate, not edify; its function is to overawe, not delight. The goal of education is the creation and transmission of knowledge — not the creation and transmission of prestige. Why, then, celebrate that education with a document that prizes grandiosity over communication?
In a way, this struck home as analogous to one of my chief concerns with art music composed in the past 100 years. Music has taken on a very complex form at the expense of simply communicating the virtual feelings it is supposed to represent. When most lay-listeners are approached by modern & some post-modern music they get turned off by the sounds written, which are (truth-be-told) a brilliant combination of pitches. The problem is that hearing the brilliance of the work is something that only extremely experienced listeners can hear, and likely only if they have a score to read as well. Having discussions with friends who have perfect pitch and incredible dictation skills, I’ve learned that none of them are able to hear the rows in 12-tone music.
It is very important that music isn’t limited by shunning the complex, we would have never gotten beethoven’s 9th symphony, the Art of Fugue, Peter Grimes, or Wagnerian Opera if we did. I find it sad, though, that we have placed greater value on music being elitest and convoluted as opposed to music being able to express feeling to common listeners. like Mr. Francese says, “Why, then, celebrate [music] that prizes grandiosity over communication?”
The Bach Partitas and Sonatas are must plays for every violinist, whether they are ancient, grumpy old soloists or young musicians who have achieved the technical proficiency to handle the works. These work’s musical depth is profound, and the famous Ciaccona might be the greatest work written for a solo violin. Fortunately since it is played, and studied intensely by every professional violinist (and even most violists), we have a plethora of incredible recordings. Some of the notable ones include Milstein’s, Grumiaux’s, and Heifetz’s (though Heifetz’s recording is extremely unconventional, whereas the other two are more traditional).
(Really weird huh?)
I’ll try and see if I can get a violinist to peruse over the parts that I am re-hosting from IMSLP and talk about the quality of the editions. Additionally, I’ll see if I can get an early music expert to discuss early-music-style recordings.